It is rotating throughout the Van der Linde gang’s movements, the Red Dead Redemption group seems not to provide the complete discrimination within the backstory of the gang’s director Van Der Linde or how the group was designed which furnishes us with a strong judgment to believe that its sequel is more extra of a prequel and concentrates on the Dutch’s story.
‘Red Dead Redemption’ presented its members an opportunity to move into the shoes of John Marston as he chases down his old group members.
It gave us some hint regarding the history of the group, it did not present any evidence as to whereby the Van Der Linde was established in the first place.
As of today, none of the Red Dead Redemption events has interpreted the destruction of the dangerous instigator from blanched and approved to delusional and contradictory.
The Dutch were choosing out-group members based on a blueprint, but many of the people were taken in by him when they attempted to rob or con him.
Red Dead Redemption 3 Main Character
The reason of Dutch should be the primary character is that the sequel can be an opportunity to obtain the figure clearer and also take in the preferred roles of the history like John or Arthur Morgan and understand more about how they discovered relationships with the group.
John and Arthur were youngsters during the Dutch took them in so in beginning their more youthful individuals would be a pleasant way to address their histories.
The foremost center should be on how the Dutch grew as an inconstant and delusional head from a much-feared individual, frequently before the gang scattered.
The concept of the prequel but with the loss of most of the notable group members, leading ahead would only anticipate the entrance of a new character, not only do we need to know about the past.
Also, keeping in mind the severe difference in the Wild West in the 20th century, it would be more suitable for RDR3 to cling to the western subject if it moves back in time.
